Robertson v. Fleitman

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1899.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1899-01-05

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Robertson v. Edelhoff

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1899-01-05

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Henry B. Platt, for plaintiff in error.

¶3Byman Tremain, for defendants in error.

¶4Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.