In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
91 F. 96 · 1899
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 14 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1949 · most notably United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. (1926), Kepner v. United States (1904)
23 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoey v. . Gilroy · Felt v. Felt · State ex rel. Lutfring v. Gœtze · In re Bruss-Ritter Co. · Stockett v. Bird's Adm'r
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The several Circuit Courts of Appeal shall have jurisdiction in equity, either interlocutory or final, to superintend and revise in matter of íaw, the proceedings of the several inferior courts of bankruptcy within their jurisdiction. Such power shall be exercised on due notice and petition by any party aggrieved.” '”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"There is a clear distinction between ‘controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings.’ as mentioned in section 24a, and tbe ‘proceedings in bankruptcy,’ which by section 24b the Circuit Courts of Appeals are given jurisdiction to superintend and revise in matter of law; for the former being generally held to embrace questions between ibe trustee, representing the bankrupt and his creditors, on the one side, and adverse claimants, on the other, and not directly affecting those administrative orders and judgments ordinarily known as ‘proceedings in bankruptcy,’ and the latter being confined to those questions arising between the bankrupt and his creditors, which are the very subject of such administrative orders and judgments, from the petition for adjudication to the discharge, and including the intermediate administrative steps and such controversies as arise between parlies to the bankruptcy proceedings as are involved in the allowance of claims, fixing their priorities, sales, allowances, and other matters to be disposed of summarily.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Snow v. Dalton““As Referee I find that the wages were earned prior to the 14th of April, 1900; that' the bankruptcy proceeding was instituted, July 16th, 1900, more than three months subsequent thereto; that the wages were not earned within three months before the date of the commencement of the proceeding. “As a matter of law I conclude that Section 64b (4) is -exclusive of Section 64b (5) and these creditors have no lien under Section 67 of the Bankruptcy Law, and the claims should not be allowed in full as debts having priority but that these creditors should take pro rata with the other creditors of the bankrupts. “Annexed hereto is the order which has been entered in this proceeding controlling the above claims. “And the said question is certified to the Judge for his opinion thereon. See 1 Am. Bankr. R. 234. “Dated, at the City of New York, the 27 day of September, A. D., 1902.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Slomka
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.