Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.2d 195 - Cooper v. United States

Cooper v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.2d 195 · 1937

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2020 · most notably Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1984), Gordon v. United States (1971)

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1501937194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Burton v. United States · Moses Haas v. William Henkel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] probation order is 'an authorized mode of mild and ambulatory punishment, the probation being intended as a reforming discipline.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.