Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.2d 208 - McVay v. Swift

McVay v. Swift’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.2d 208 · 1937

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1971

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2019371940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ide v. Leiser · In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. · American Creosote Works, Inc. v. City of Natchitoches · Jones v. Jones · Barchus v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is Therefore, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed: “1. That plaintiff’s bill as amended, be and it is hereby dismissed in so far as Charles H. Swift and the lands therein described are concerned; “2. That the clerk of Court and ex-officio recorder of the Parish of St. Landry, State of Louisiana, be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to cancel and erase from the mortgage records of his office, the judicial mortgage resulting from the registry of the final decree pro confesso herein rendered and signed on May 29th, 1936, in so far as the same affects defendant Charles H. Swift and the property, described in said decree are concerned; and “3. That all costs be taxed against plaintiff except such as were incurred up to July 20, 1936, when said final decree pro confesso was set aside and held for naught in so far as it affected said Charles H. Swift, and as to those that were necessarily incurred by reason of the fact that said Charles H. Swift was a party defendant shall be taxed against him; to all of which the plaintiff excepts and his exception is allowed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * an option may not be enforced until it has become a contract by an election to exercise it made in the way and manner the law prescribes.” (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.