Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.2d 301 - Sullivan v. Meyer

Sullivan v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.2d 301 · 1937

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 1989 · most notably Howard University v. Best (1984), Afro-American Publishing Co. v. Jaffe (1966)

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

80193719401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peck v. Tribune Co. · Washington Post Co. v. Chaloner · Commercial Pub. Co. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * 'A publication claimed to be defamatory must be read and construed in the sense in which the readers to whom it is addressed would ordinarily understand it. So the whole item, including display lines, should be read and construed together, and its meaning and signification thus determined. When thus read, if its meaning is so unambiguous as to reasonably bear but one interpretation, it is for the judge to say whether that signification is defamatory or not.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * At all events, the situation was such that legitimate criticism or comment was justifiable. The article complained of goes no farther.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.