Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 1129 - Hake v. Clarke

Hake v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 1129 · 1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Sandin v. Conner · Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson · Denton v. Hernandez · Carney v. Houston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Screening-The court shall review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. (b) Grounds for dismissal.-On review, the court shall identi~r cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaints- (1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.