Keenan v. Allan’s Empirical Analysis
91 F.3d 1275 · 1996
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 46 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 291 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Far Out Productions, Inc. v. Oskar (2001), Simmons v. Navajo County (2010)
14 federal appellate · 46 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Taylor v. List · Warren III v. City of Carlsbad · Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union · Stewart v. Brown · 102 Wash. 2d 219 - Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 291 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“identify with reasonable particularity the evidence that precludes summary judgment.”
26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.