Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

91 F.3d 132

Docket No. 96-6232.

Montgomery v. B Moore

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 20, 1995. Decided July 1, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-07-01

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Stephen Michael O'Kane

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-07-01

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Montgomery v. Moore, No. CA-95-1198-6-3AK (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/91/f3d/132 · .json · Public domain