Yarborough v. Parks

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-07-09

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Walker

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-07-09

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find the appeal to be frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Parks, No. CA-96-31-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED