Kopstein Ellison v. Kopstein

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 1996. Decided July 12, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-07-12

Relies on Langley v. Fidel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-07-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2018

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM*

¶2

We affirm on the basis of our opinion in Wilson v. Wynns (In re Wilson), No. 95-15072, slip op. ---- (9th Cir. ------, 1996), decided today.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3