Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 291 - KBI Security Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

KBI Security Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 291 · 1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2017

8 federal appellate ·

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 156 (§ 6 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have the authority to modify an order to ensure that it... effectuate[s] [the Act's] policies. Where the Board's order is insufficiently 'tailored to the unfair labor practice it is intended to redress,' or is unduly burdensome on the employer, it may be modified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No matter not included in exceptions or cross-exceptions may thereafter be urged before the Board, or in any further proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.