Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 30 - Canedy v. Boardman

Canedy v. Boardman’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 30 · 1996

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2018

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz · Kellogg v. United States · Canedy v. Boardman · Mack v. O'Leary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But in 1992, the time of the events in question here, it was not at all clear that [plaintiff's interest in observing Islam's nudity taboos] decisively outweighed [the interests] of the prison.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sutton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.