Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 416 - Massieu v. Reno

Massieu v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 416 · 1996

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Xin Jie Xie v. Ashcroft (2004), Richardson v. Reno (1998)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

180199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha · McCarthy v. Madigan · Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven where an alien is attempting to prevent an exclusion or deportation proceeding from taking place in the first instance and is thus not, strictly speaking, attacking a final order of deportation or exclusion, it is well settled that judicial review is precluded if the alien has failed to avail himself of all administrative remedies, one of which is the deportation or exclusion hearing itself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he [ Thunder Basin ] Court's fundamental point, we think, was that both statutory and constitutional claims could be meaningfully addressed in the court of appeals.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an order of deportation or of exclusion shall not be reviewed by any court if the alien has not exhausted the administrative remedies available to him as of right under the immigration laws and regulations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.