Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 586 - Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania Inc

Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania Inc’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2012

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hazelwood School District v. United States · City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. · Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education · Crisp v. Rubin · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]ace-based preferences cannot be justified by reference to past `societal' discrimination in which the municipality played no material role.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[a]n analysis is not devoid of probative value simply [b]ecause it may theoretically be possible to adopt a more refined approach!.]” Contractors Ass’n of E. Pa. v. City of Philadelphia, 91 F.3d 586, 603 (3d Cir.1996). 10 . Other studies have disputed the value of capacity analysis, explaining that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[A] court cannot conduct the strict scrutiny review required by Croson without first identifying with specificity the discrimination allegedly giving rise to the compelling state interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.