Alexander v. Pathfinder, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
91 F.3d 59 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2016
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12181 (§ 301 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Alexander v. Choate · University of Tennessee v. Elliott · Van Treese v. Blome · Gibb v. Scott · Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provided that the [state] agency was acting in a judicial capacity, the questions litigated were properly before the agency judge, and the parties had an adequate opportunity to litigate them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.