Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 677 - United States v. Upton

United States v. Upton’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 677 · 1996

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Villegas (2005), United States v. Escalante-Reyes (2012)

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

3001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Vandygriff v. Phillips · United States v. Gaudin · Doerr v. Doerr · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]laims made without citation to authority or references to the record are considered abandoned on appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “during the course of the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense of conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This Circuit permits a district court to refuse to submit an instruction regarding a good faith defense if the defense is substantially covered by the charge given and the defendant has had the opportunity to argue good faith to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.