Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 F.3d 797 - Purtle v. Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.

Purtle v. Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

91 F.3d 797 · 1996

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh (2004), Crabill v. Trans Union, L.L.C. (2001)

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

190199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 105 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1631 (§ 121 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (§ 130 of the Truth in Lending Act)

Relies on In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Acosta v. United States · Wrenn v. Gould · Smith v. Chapman · Fannie Thomas, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Myers-Dickson Furniture Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(2)(A)(i) in the case of an individual action twice the amount of any finance charge in connection with the transaction, or (ii) in the case of an individual action relating to a consumer lease . . . 25 per centum of the total amount of monthly payments under the lease, except that the liability under this subparagraph shall not be less than $100 nor greater than $1,000 . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] plaintiff in a TILA case need not prove that he or she suffered actual monetary damages in order to recover the statutory damages and attorney's fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.