United States v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
91 F.3d 86 · 1996
Citation profile
24 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Wright (2000), United States v. Robinson (1996)
24 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Koon v. United States · Miller v. Gentry · United States v. Lira-Barraza · United States v. Buenrostro-Torres · United States v. Luna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actual knowledge of the details of the robbery plan is irrelevant”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.