Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Washington Western District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (§ 2 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1602 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1603 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1605A · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.