Goehring v. Target’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Margolis v. Ryan · Shields v. Morton Chemical Company · Mico Mobile Sales & Leasing, Inc. v. Skyline Corp. · Robinson v. Williamsen Idaho Equipment Company · Clark v. Chrishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“warnings [were] adequate and, had they been read and heeded, would have prevented the injury’’)); Alfano v. BRP Inc., No, 2:08CV1704JAMDAD, 2010 WL 2292265 , at (E.D. Cal, June 4, 2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.