Schatzman v. Talley’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2009
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77V (§ 22 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper · Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · Ristaino v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the forthrightness and vigor with which the representative party can be expected to assert and defend the interests of the members of the class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“vigor with which the case will be pursued”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.