Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 FRD 47 - In re Screws Antitrust Litigation

In re Screws Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Dennis v. United States · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · Greene v. Massey · Stevens v. Marks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Supreme Court emphasized that the competing interests of the parties seeking and opposing disclosure must be viewed in their appropriate context, that the standard governing disclosure is not a rigid one, and that the burden on the party favoring release of the transcripts is an ever changing one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is equally clear that as the considerations justifying secrecy become less relevant, a party asserting a need for grand jury transcripts will have a lesser burden in showing justification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to equalize the access to relevant facts which each side possesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.