91 F. Supp. 2d 1337 - Pronsolino v. Marcus’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1288 · 33 U.S.C. § 1311 · 33 U.S.C. § 1313 · 33 U.S.C. § 1314 · 33 U.S.C. § 1329 · 33 U.S.C. § 1342 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · City of Milwaukee v. Illinois · Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The 1972 Act superimposed the technology-driven mandate of point-source effluent limitations. To assess the impact of the new strategy on the monumental clean-up task facing the nation, Congress called for a list of the unfinished business expected to remain even after application of the new cleanup strategy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guido A. Pronsolino Betty J. Pronsolino, as Trustees for the Guido A. Pronsolino and Betty J. Pronsolino Trust the Mendocino County Farm Bureau the California Farm Bureau Federation the American Farm Bureau Federation v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non-Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. Guido A. Pronsolino v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees v. American Forest & Paper Association California Forestry Association, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellants · Pronsolino“Each State shall identify those waters within its boundaries ... [not meeting] any water quality standard applicable to such waters.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guido A. Pronsolino Betty J. Pronsolino, as Trustees for the Guido A. Pronsolino and Betty J. Pronsolino Trust the Mendocino County Farm Bureau the California Farm Bureau Federation the American Farm Bureau Federation v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non-Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. Guido A. Pronsolino v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees v. American Forest & Paper Association California Forestry Association, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellants · Pronsolino“for which the effluent limitations required by section [301(b)(1)(A)] and section [301(b)(1)(B)]... are not stringent enough.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guido A. Pronsolino Betty J. Pronsolino, as Trustees for the Guido A. Pronsolino and Betty J. Pronsolino Trust the Mendocino County Farm Bureau the California Farm Bureau Federation the American Farm Bureau Federation v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non-Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. Guido A. Pronsolino v. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Christie Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, a California Non Profit Corporation San Francisco Baykeeper, a California Public Benefit Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees v. American Forest & Paper Association California Forestry Association, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellants · Pronsolino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.