United States v. Bin Laden’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2155 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332A (§ 60023 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3238 · 18 U.S.C. § 844
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Blockburger v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Pinkerton v. United States · Hamling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determinative question in a motion to strike sur-plusage is not the potential prejudice, but rather the relevance of the allegation to the crime charged in the indictment. If the evidence of the allegation is admissible and relevant to the charge, then despite prejudice, the language will not be stricken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that occurred exclusively outside the jurisdiction of any particular state”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.