¶1A full discussion of the numerous points ruled in this •case would require an opinion of great length and ■tedious minuteness. No such seems necessary; and merely to restate the points and reiterate the rulings ■announced in the syllabus would be unprofitable. In ■most instances, the correctness of these rulings is sufficiently apparent on the face of them. The propositions in which they are embodied and enunciated are almost .self-evident. We leave the case to stand on the head*264llotes, together with the facts set out in the official-report. Judgment affirmed.
91 Ga. 254
McTyier v. State
Decided November 21, 1892
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1892-11-21
Before Judge Fish. Sumter superior court. May-term, 1892. Indictment for seduction of Miss Jennings; verdict of guilty; exception to denial of a new trial. Tbe motion for new trial sets forth the following: 1. Error in admitting the testimony of Miss Jennings, over the objection of defendant’s counsel, in relation to promises of marriage after the alleged seduction.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-11-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Anthony v. State (2016), Keller v. State (1897)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →