State v. Brinton’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1976
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. McMahan · State v. Davidson · United States v. Henderson · State v. Hintz · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appeal ~by the state. — An appeal may be taken by the state: 1. From a judgment for the defendant on a demurrer to the indictment or information. 2. From an order, entered before the trial of a person charged with a criminal offense, which directs the return of seized property, suppresses evidence, or otherwise denies the prosecution the use of evidence at trial if the prosecuting attorney and the attorney general certify to the judge who granted such motion that the appeal is taken in good faith, is not taken for the purpose of delay, and that the evidence suppressed constitutes a necessary portion of the state’s case to prove the charge pending against the defendant. No such property or evidence shall be returned until the expiration of ten (10) days from and after the date on which the order was entered. An appeal by the state pursuant to this subsection shall stay the return of such property or evidence and shall constitute a bar to the prosecution of the case unless such order is reversed upon appeal. Appeals pursuant to this subsection shall be expedited by the Supreme Court and shall receive priority over all other criminal and civil appeals. 3. From an order granting a new trial. 4. From an order arresting judgment. 5. From an order made after judgment affecting the substantial rights of the prosecution. 6. From any ruling of the trial judge during the course of the trial on the receipt of rejection of testimony, and from any ruling of the trial judge on the giving o”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blair
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.