Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 ILLAPP 373 - Strauss v. Phillips

Strauss v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1902
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Shepard v. Speer · Elting v. First National Bank of Biggsville · Smith v. Smith · Winslow v. Leland · Goodman v. Kopperl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The allowance against the Nebraska administrator was not conclusive against the Illinois administrator. Smith v. Smith, 174 Ill. 52 , and the cases there cited. Her claim was therefore open to contest when it came to be filed against Fitzgerald’s estate in the Probate Court of Cook County and the fact that it was allowed without objection by Phillips, the administrator, as of a particular class, does not prevent the Probate Court of Cook County from a re-examination of it at any time before distribution and adjusting it according to its real merits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.