Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

91 Ind. 376

State v. Hallowell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1883

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1883-11-22

<p>Cbim&AL Law. — Appeal.—Question Reserved. — Record.— Verdict. — Judgment. —In case of an appeal, upon the part of the State, from a question reserved, in a criminal case, no question is presented to the Supreme Court where the record does not contain the verdict and judgment of acquittal.</p> <p>Same. — Statute Construed.— Certiorari. — Under section 1883, E. S. 1881, it is not the duty of the Supreme Court, in such case, on its own motion, to-direct the clerk to certify up a correct record. The writ of certiorari can issue only upon motion sustained affidavit, showing a diminution of the record.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1883-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1984

5 state decisions

2018831890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hammond, J.

¶1— This is an appeal by the State in a criminal case, upon questions reserved, upon the refusal of the court below to give to the jury certain instructions which were tendered by the prosecuting attorney. If there was any record made of the trial, the verdict of the jury, or the judgment of the court, it is not embraced in the transcript. Sec. 1883, E. S. 1881, relating to appeals in such cases, is as follows : “ In case of an appeal from a question reserved on the part of the State, it shall not be necessary for the clerk of the court below to certify, in the transcript, any part of the proceedings and record except the bill of exceptions and the judgment of acquittal. When the question reserved is defectively stated, the Supreme Court may direct any part of the proceedings and record to be certified to them.”

¶2As the record does not contain the verdict and judgment of acquittal, the appeal presents no question for the consideration of this court. It might be inferred from the last part of the section above quoted, that this court should, of its own motion, direct the clerk of the court below to certify to us the record of the verdict and judgment. The writ of certiorari can issue only upon motion, supported by affidavit, showing a diminution of the record. We do not judicially know but that the clerk has certified all the record that was made in the case.

¶3The appeal is not sustained.

/91/ind/376 · .json · Public domain