Haas v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
1883
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 1985 · most notably Conant v. National State Bank (1889), Henneger v. Lomas (1896)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Logan v. Logan · Thomas v. Passage · Bearss v. Montgomery · Kelley v. McFadden · Matteson v. Ellsworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A married woman may enter into any contract in reference to her separate personal estate, trade, business, labor or service, and the management and improvement of her separate real property, the same as if she were sole, and her separate estate, real and personal, shall be liable therefor on execution or other judicial procéss.” Acts 1879, p. 160.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rothschild v. Raab
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.