Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 KAN 190 - Singer v. Taylor

Singer v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1976

18 state decisions

501914192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clapp v. . Fullerton · Woman's Union Missionary Society of America v. Mead · Ingraham v. Ingraham · Singer v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An equitable proceeding for the construction of a will is peculiarly a case that appeals to the discretion of a court, and where there is an ambiguity in the will and a real question of interpretation the court is justified in not only assessing the costs of the litigation against the estate but also in allowing reasonable attorneys’ fees payable out of the estate to the defeated as well as the successful party.” (p. 192.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.