Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 KAN 26 - Sexton v. Holt

Sexton v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1953
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1953

4 state decisions

2019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dotson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Phœnix Insurance v. Haskett · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Conlon · Jobling v. Tuttle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To be adverse the use must be under a claim of right with the knowledge of the owner of the estate but without his consent.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.