Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 MINN 143 - State v. Nelson

State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
5
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently March 1985 · most notably Gruenhagen v. Larson (1976), State v. DeZeler (1950)

54 state decisions

120190319101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dennis v. State · State v. Gut · People v. Neumann · State v. Cantieny · Selden, Withers & Co. v. Bank of Commerce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases removed to the highest court for review, the evidence, -when returned on the appeal, should first be looked to for the purpose ■of determining the guilt or innocence of defendant. If there be no doubt of his guilt, alleged errors not affecting his substantial or ■constitutional rights should be brushed aside, and in their place substituted the almighty force and power of truth. The conviction of an innocent person is far too remote a probability to justify an application of the technical rules of law so necessary in olden times, when persons were not surrounded by the same constitutional and statutory safeguards as at the present day. The safeguards thrown around accused persons are not intended as a means to enable the criminal to effect an escape from the- punishment his crime calls for, but to protect the innocent and secure to all a fair, impartial, and orderly trial on definite lines of procedure.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.