Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 MISS 377 - State v. Presley

State v. Presley’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
December 1963
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1963

8 state decisions

301907191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case before us we think the indictment charges a condition of things manifestly against the will of the party robbed. Technical law. is good law under proper circumstances, but not where it shocks common sense. One cannot ‘unlawfully, feloniously, forcibly, and violently’ rob and steal from the person of another, without its being against his will.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.