Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

91 N.C. App. 242

In re Teague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1988

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1988-09-06

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2019

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-09-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Judge Greene

¶1concurring in the result.

¶2While I agree that Section 7A-689 requires findings concerning the requisition’s correctness and the juvenile’s identity, I otherwise concur only in the majority’s result. I do note the finding that the requisition is “in order” must not be taken lightly. In order to be complete, a requisition under Section 7A-689 must include:

. . . the name and age of the delinquent juvenile, the particulars of his adjudication as a delinquent juvenile, the circumstances of the breach of the terms of his probation or parole or of his escape from an institution or agency vested with his legal custody or supervision, and the location of such delinquent juvenile, if known, at the time the requisition is made. The requisition shall be verified by affidavit, shall be executed in duplicate, and shall be accompanied by two certified copies of the judgment, formal adjudication, or order of commitment which subjects such delinquent juvenile to probation or parole or to the legal custody of the institution or agency concerned.

¶3The court’s finding must thus be based on evidence in the record that the requisition conforms in all respects to these requirements.

/91/ncapp/242 · .json · Public domain