Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 NCAPP 469 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on White v. White · Clark v. Clark · 10 N.C. App. 545 - In Re Custody of Stancil · 53 N.C. App. 373 - Matter of Peirce · Wilson County Board of Education v. Lamm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we agree that the testimony has characteristics of hearsay under the North Carolina Rules of Evidence, we hold that its admission was not prejudicial. The admission of incompetent testimony will not be held prejudicial when its import is abundantly established by other competent testimony, or the testimony is merely cumulative or corroborative. Because both plaintiff and defendant presented a considerable amount of conflicting evidence regarding the alleged sexual abuse, we conclude that the admission of this testimony was not prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.