Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Nev. 218 - Fox v. Cusick

Fox v. Cusick’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2016

20 state decisions

9019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Price v. Sinnott · Barreth v. Reno Bus Lines, Inc. · Amundsen v. Ohio Brass Co. · Sierra Pacific Power Company v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the weight of the evidence . . . may have been against the verdict returned in the view of the trial judge, does not invest him with authority to order that the cause be tried again.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for the jury to weigh the evidence and assess the credibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.