Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 NEV 27 - LaPorta v. Broadbent

LaPorta v. Broadbent’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Saka · Gragson v. Toco · Pfister v. Shelton · Leeming v. Leeming · State Ex Rel. Johns v. Gragson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an election is prevented in any precinct or district by reason of the loss or destruction of the ballots intended for that precinct, or any other cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “NRS 293.465 is unequivocal on the subject of a faulty election when the ballots are unavailable and concluding that the election was prevented by the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The fundamentals of suffrage require that electors shall have the opportunity to participate in elections . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.