Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 NJEQ 67 - Keppelmann v. Keppelmann

Keppelmann v. Keppelmann’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1971

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

601919192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The manifest purpose of Congress was that the statute should operate, not only upon property the legal title to which is in the alien, but oh all property-held for him, or for his benefit, whether the legal title be in him or in the person who holds it for his benefit. In the present case, the property is held in trust by the complainants solely for the benefit of these three daughters of the testator, and comes within' the very words of the statute, for although they are not the holders of the legal title to the trust estate, they are the equitable owners thereof; the whole beneficial interest being lodged in them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “-» * * phe manifest purpose of Congress was that the statute should operate, not only upon property the legal title to which is in the alien, but on all property held for him, or for his benefit, whether the legal title be in him or in the person who holds it for his benefit. * * • * [Emphasis supplied.] [ 91 N.J.Eq. at 69 , 108 A. at 433 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.