91 N.J. Super. 470 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1970
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. United States · State v. Williams · Commonwealth v. ROTHLISBERGER · 85 N.J. Super. 391 - State v. Murphy · Corp. of the Chamber of Commerce v. Bennett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was no prejudicial error in the admission of the composite because of its lack of any striking resemblance to defendant and its practically worthless probative value as part of the State's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is the same rule which [in that state] governs admissibility of a prior identification by the witness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“or where there is a claim that the testimony at trial is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.