State v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Solem v. Stumes (1984), State v. Bedolla (1991)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Michigan v. Mosley · Michigan v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A determination of the voluntariness of the subsequent waiver depends not merely on a formal utterance of waiver, but upon all the facts and circumstances of the particular case. State v. Crump, 82 N.M. 487 , 484 P.2d 329 (1971). These facts and circumstances include the background, experience and conduct of the accused. State v. Sexton, 82 N.M. 648 , 485 P.2d 982 , cert, denied, 82 N.M. 639 , 485 P.2d 973 (Ct.App.1971). It is for the trial judge in the first instance to hear the evidence as to voluntariness, weigh the conflicts in the evidence presented at the suppression hearing, and determine whether the State has carried its “heavy burden.” Where there is evidence to support the ruling of the trial court, we will not find error as a matter of law. State v. Ramirez, [ 89 N.M. 635 , 556 P.2d 43 ] supra. .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trujillo · State v. Greene“We hold that (1) once a person is arrested and has asserted his right to counsel he may, upon receiving new and adequate “Miranda warnings,” change his mind for reasons satisfactory to himself and voluntarily submit to questioning, and (2) once the right to counsel has been effectively invoked, the State bears a heavy burden in demonstrating that a subsequent waiver is knowing and voluntary. [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Utter“... [A]dmission into evidence of volunteered statements is not prohibited by the fifth and fourteenth amendments, where there are no facts to indicate that the statement is made in response to `interrogation.' ... Volunteered statements of any type are not barred by the fifth amendment, and their admissibility is not affected by Miranda v. Arizona ... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Poller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.