Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 N.M. 70 - State v. Dawson

State v. Dawson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2001 · most notably State v. Harris (1984), State v. Martinez (1978)

29 state decisions

1601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dutton v. Evans · Oyler v. Boles · Mancusi v. Stubbs · Bowen v. Johnston · James Graham v. State of West Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The charge of being an habitual offender is as effectively refuted by proof that there was no prior conviction or that the prior convictions were not penitentiary offenses as by proof that the accused is not the person charged with the new offense. The charge of being an habitual offender is also effectively refuted by proof that the prior convictions were not constitutionally valid as, for example, where one went to trial without a lawyer under circumstances where the appointment of someone to represent him was a requirement of due process. Denial or absence of counsel is an issue raisable on collateral attack of state judgments.” (Our emphasis.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Having made this contention, defendant was entitled to present evidence going toward the asserted invalidity. Summarizing: 1. Defendant has the burden of producing evidence in support of his defense that his prior convictions are invalid. 2. Until such evidence is produced, this defense simply is not a matter to be decided. 3. Once such evidence is produced, the State has the burden of persuasion as to the validity of the prior convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.