Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 N.M. 727 - State v. O'NEIL

State v. O'NEIL’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2012 · most notably Parke v. Raley (1993), Hall v. State (1980)

36 state decisions

14019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Moser · State v. Maes · State v. Gallegos · State v. Wilson · State v. Elledge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Having made this contention, defendant was entitled to present evidence going toward the asserted invalidity. Summarizing: 1. Defendant has the burden of producing evidence in support of his defense that his prior convictions are invalid. 2. Until such evidence is produced, this defense simply is not a matter to be decided. 3. Once such evidence is produced, the State has the burden of persuasion as to the validity of the prior convictions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2003 UT App 95 - State v. Gutierrez · State v. Garcia
  2. “The State makes a prima facie case upon proof that defendant has been convicted of a prior felony. * * * * * * Defendant’s position throughout has been that the State has the burden of proving the validity of the prior convictions. Until defendant raised an issue as to the validity of the prior convictions, “validity” was not an issue in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Garcia

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.