Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Ohio App. 3d 10 - State v. Collins

91 Ohio App. 3d 10 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably 127 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Stamps (1998), State v. Dankworth (2007)

29 state decisions

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Butcher · State v. Mincy · State v. Ladd · State v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The time within which an accused must be brought to trial, or, in the case of felony, to preliminary hearing or trial, may be extended only by the following: *Page 10 {¶ 54} * * * {¶ 55} (E) Any period of delay necessitated by reason of a plea in bar or abatement, motion, proceeding, or action made by or instituted by the accused; {¶ 56} * * * {¶ 57} (H) The period of any continuance granted on the accused's own motion, and the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused's own motion; * * *”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(E) For purposes of computing time under divisions (A), (B), (C)(2), and (D) of this section, each day during which the accused is held in jail in lieu of bail on the pending charge shall be counted as three days. * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Crim. R. 32(A) provides that `pending sentence, the court may commit the defendant or continue or alter the bail.' A defendant has no constitutional right to bail after judgment of conviction. * * * Prior to sentencing, no order of commitment exists and the defendant is still, in effect, being held for the pending charge. If a court chooses to continue a bond for a defendant, pending sentence for one conviction, even while awaiting trial on remaining charges, an accused who remains in jail is still being held `in lieu of bail.' {¶ 49}”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.