91 Ohio App. 3d 611 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenkins · State v. Apanovitch · State v. Edwards · State v. Parson · State v. Finnerty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Effective representation generally requires more than an interview in a courthouse hallway.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“We read Parson to mean that a trial court abuses its discretion by failing to exclude evidence where the defense is able to show prejudice or would benefit from foreknowledge of the statement, or where there has been a willful violation of Crim. R. 16 by the prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“While the least onerous form of sanction is generally preferred, * * * the court's adoption of it constitutes an abuse of discretion when on the record before the court that sanction is insufficient to relieve the prejudice the discovery failure has created.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Lincoln
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.