Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Ohio App. 3d 71 - State v. Wright

91 Ohio App. 3d 71 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Bridgeman · 83 Ohio App. 3d 410 - State v. Breaston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury must determine the value of the stolen property and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Charlton, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)
  2. “return the finding of value as part of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Charlton, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.