Chari v. Vore’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
342 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 342 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion) (2020), 98 Ohio St. 3d 298 - State ex rel. Denton v. Bedinghaus (2003)
342 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Xenia v. Wallace · State v. Robinson · Commonwealth v. Walker · Gaskins v. Shiplevy · State v. Doran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 342 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n the absence of any statutory definition of the requisite verification, we must apply the word's usual, normal, or customary meaning. State ex rel. Cuyahoga Cty. v. State Personnel Bd. of Review (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 496 , 499 , 696 N.E.2d 1054 ; R.C. 1.42 . `Verification' means a `formal declaration made in the presence of an authorized officer, such as a notary public, by which one swears to the truth of the statements in the document.' Garner, Black's Law Dictionary (7 Ed. 1999) 1556 * * *.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, application is by petition that contains certain information. R.C. 2725.04 . Then, if the court decides that the petition states a facially valid claim, it must allow the writ. R.C. 2725.06 . Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'R.C. Chapter 2725 prescribes a basic, summary procedure for bringing a habeas corpus action.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.