State v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 80 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Haliym v. Mitchell (2007), Franklin v. Anderson (2006)
4 federal appellate · 80 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Murnahan · Gomez v. Dade County School Board · Holsey v. Director of Classification for Division of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he two-pronged analysis found in Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , is the appropriate standard to assess whether [an applicant] has raised a `genuine issue' as to the ineffectiveness of appellate counsel in his request to reopen under App.R. 26(B)(5).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`deficient for failing to raise the issues he now presents and that there was a reasonable probability of success had he *Page 3 presented those claims on appeal.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.