Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 OHIOST3D 440 - State v. Muncie

State v. Muncie’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

220
cited by 220 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

220 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 220 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Ketterer (2010), In re A.J.S. (2008)

220 state decisions

1010200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington v. Harper · Riggins v. Nevada · State v. Curcio · State v. Berry · State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 220 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and parties in the action.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a proceeding ancillary to an action, including, but not limited to, a proceeding for a preliminary injunction, attachment, discovery of privileged matter, or suppression of evidence.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'the proverbial bell cannot be unrung and an appeal after final judgment on the merits will not rectify the damage' suffered by the appealing party.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.