Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Okla. 18 - Henderson v. Todd

Henderson v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 1933
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1933

9 state decisions

5019231930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Reed · Reed v. Scott · Brigman v. Cheney · Penny v. Fellner · Connelly v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where plaintiff in error fails! to set forth in his brief, as required by Rule 25 ( 20 Okla. xlii ), argument or citation of authorities in support of any assignment of error, it will be deemed, as to such assignment, that he has waived same.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.