91 Okla. Crim. 310 - Bush v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 12 Okla. Crim. 560 - Choate v. State · 88 Okla. Crim. 279 - Glasgow v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 180 - Wilson v. State · 57 Okla. Crim. 377 - Bourns v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 310 - Keith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon any prosecution for embezzlement it is a sufficient defense that the property was appropriated openly and avowedly, and under a claim of title preferred in good faith even though such claim is untenable. But this provision shall not excuse the retention of the property of another, to offset or pay demand held against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rhine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.